Habitat 2000 / Learning About Wildlife
Lesson
Guide | Communities
for Wildlife | Habitat
Projects and Resources | Registration
and Funding | Featured
School | News
| Contact Us
| NWW
Partners
Planning for People and Wildlife
Lesson Information
Age: Grades 4-12
Subjects: Social Studies, Art, Science
Skills: analysis, application, comparing
similarities and differences, discussion, drawing, evaluation,
invention, media construction, psychomotor development,
problem-solving, synthesis, visualization
Duration: minimum of five 45-minute periods
Group Size: any
Setting: indoors
Key Vocabulary: land-use planning, community,
city
Objectives
Students will be able to:
- describe considerations that are important in land-use
planning for cities and other human communities;
- identify means by which negative impact on wildlife and
other elements of the natural environment can be reduced
in developing cities; and
- describe actions that can be taken in some contemporary
cities to enhance them as places in which both people and
some wildlife can live.
Method
Students imagine and research what the area in which they
live was like before a community was developed; design planned
communities, and build and evaluate models of their community
designs.
Background
NOTE: This activity is used effectively to culminate in a
unit on the importance of land-use planning, as well as issues
affecting people, wildlife, and the environment.
Cities have developed as people have clustered together
for purposes of meeting their needs -- from shelter to food
to a sense of community. They have typically developed as
a hub of transportation and commerce, again serving as a means
by which people meet their day-to-day survival needs. The
development of cities, however, has been a mixed blessing.
The large concentration of people in a given area has displaced
plants and animals that lived there previously and has given
rise to problems unique to such crowded conditions. For example,
varying forms of pollution accumulate in such centres, frequently
with inadequate means for handling them -- from products of
industry to human waste.
Most cities are not the result of careful planning. Most
have developed haphazardly, with attention to problems taking
place when crises emerge. Crime, unemployment, poor housing,
smog, contamination of water supplies by industrial and sewage
waste disposal, energy consumption, transportation costs,
and land-use sprawl are all among the serious problems facing
contemporary cities today.
People today are faced with many important choices concerning
how and where they will live. Many people in Canada are leaving
the cities for suburban and rural life, bringing some of the
same problems with them that encouraged them to leave the
cities in the first place. New communities -- large and small
-- are being developed. Some are the result of individual
families moving into previously undeveloped areas; some are
the result of business interests organizing to develop resources
in an area, and creating entirely new cities in the process.
This is happening in areas throughout the planet. Whole areas
of some large and old cities are decaying as they are abandoned;
in some cities, re-development projects are taking place to
try to improve the habitability of the old and dying neighbourhoods.
Ethical questions arise as people make decisions about where
and how they will live. Any development or re-development
of an area has an impact on the plants and animals who do
and can live there, as well as on any people who might live
there. Sometimes the development can be of benefit, and sometimes
of long-term harm. When such decisions are made, it seems
prudent to plan for the impact of our actions as carefully
and thoughtfully as possible.
The major purpose of this activity is for students to consider
the importance of land-use planning in community maintenance,
improvement, and development. The concepts can be applied
when considering re-development of old cities, as well as
building of new cities and alternative communities in which
people can live and work.
Materials
Heavy cardboard or masonite; salt, flour and water to make
salt clay for a model-building material; glue; toothpicks;
natural materials like dried grass and construction paper
for making buildings, roads, people, wildlife, and other components
of community; tempera paint, brushes; and any other materials
available and useful in model-building.
Procedure
- This is a "design a community" activity. Ask the students
to close their eyes and visualize the community in which
they live. If they live in a city, or if there is a city
nearby, ask them to visualize how the city looks. Next,
ask them to try to visualize what that area might have looked
like before the city or community was built in that spot.
What plants were common to the area? What animals? Was there
water in the area? What was the topography of the land?
- Ask for a committee of volunteers to find out more precisely
what the land, vegetation, wildlife, etc., was like in their
area before their community was built. If the students live
in a rural area where there is no city, ask them to find
out this information for any city or community of their
choice; e.g., the nearest big city. Ask the committee to
report back to the rest of the students with this information
in approximately one week. Sources could include provincial,
territorial, city, or county historical societies, libraries,
etc. City, regional, and provincial or territorial land-use
planning offices may also have such information.
- Ask the committee to report back to the rest of the students.
The committee should report both visually and verbally.
For example, they should list the descriptive characteristics
of the vegetation in the area and identify the kinds of
wildlife and the food and water sources upon which that
wildlife depended. Ask the committee to describe their findings
thoroughly enough that the rest of the students can visualize
a clear picture of what the area looked like before a community
was developed there. Also ask the committee to leave a visual
record of the major information they found for the rest
of the students to use as a reference during the rest of
this activity.
- Next, ask all of the students, including the committee
members who did the background research, to divide into
working groups of from two to four students. Tell each group
that it is their task to develop a community in this natural
area, given the background information the committee has
provided. In designing their community, they should aim
to develop a community in which people live and work with
the least possible negative impact on the existing vegetation,
air quality, water , soil, and wildlife, at the same time
that the needs of the people are met as well. In order to
do this, the students should consider the following, as
well as factors they identify:
- water sources, transportation, and treatment
- economic base; e.g., industry, small business
- kinds of housing, school, shopping areas, job sites
- ecological and recreational features; e.g., open space,
green belts, parks
- sewage and waste disposal and treatment
- utilities
- food sources, transportation, and treatment
- aesthetics
- environmental safeguards
- means to effectively expand the number of people who
can live in the community, if necessary, retaining minimum
impact on the quality of the environment
- Once each group has come up with a community development
plan, review and discuss their plan with them.
- Once their plans have been approved, provide the students
with the necessary materials to build a model of their community
. (See "Materials" above.)
- Once all the groups have developed their models of the
communities they have designed, have a "Model Community
Design Show," with each of the groups explaining the design
features of their community .
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each community
design in detail. For example, include "What if" questions,
such as: "What if a new school had to be built?" "What if
there is a drought or severe winter? Would it be necessary
to take special measures to assist the wildlife?"
- Return to the models after two weeks to a month and ask
the students to reflect upon whether they would make any
changes in their community designs, as if they had had the
opportunity to "live" in their communities for a while and
might now see the need to do some things differently.
- Ask a local architect, city planner, wildlife biologist,
or other resource manager to visit the class, in order to
review and discuss the various model communities with the
students who designed them.
Extensions and Variations
- Show photos of actual cities. Look for advantages and
disadvantages of city life, under a variety of circumstances.
- Get a map showing a community (preferably yours) 15,
25, 50, 75, 150 years ago. Evaluate the planning -- or lack
of it -- that seems to have taken place, with what results.
Aquatic Extension
Ten years have passed. Your community has doubled in size.
What measures, if any, have you taken to protect the availability
and quality of water in the community? What impacts, if any,
have there been to wildlife in the area as a result of this
increase in population? What changes, if any, need to be made
in order to protect the availability and quality of the water
resources in this community for the next 25 years -- for both
people and wildlife?
Evaluation
Name five important uses that must be considered for land
in a human community. For each of the previously mentioned
considerations, list two ways that impact on the environment
and wildlife can be reduced.
In most major cities, land-use planning has been non-existent
or minimal. Describe five methods that might be used to enhance
the existence of a city's people and wildlife, with explanations
for the methods you choose.
|
 |